| Title |
Hemodynamic effects of extended prone position sessions in ARDS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0464-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Ruste, Laurent Bitker, Hodane Yonis, Zakaria Riad, Aurore Louf-Durier, Floriane Lissonde, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Claude Guerin, Jean-Christophe Richard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 16 | 28% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,154,124
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#129
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,791
of 447,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.