↓ Skip to main content

What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
Title
What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements
Published in
Natural Hazards, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z
Authors

Ewa Lechowska

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 457 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 11%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 164 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 16%
Engineering 50 11%
Social Sciences 40 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 6%
Unspecified 10 2%
Other 66 14%
Unknown 191 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,779,460
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#134
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,862
of 341,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.