| Title |
Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117 studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-018-0349-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie C. Reid, Janelle Unger, Devin McCaskell, Laura Childerhose, David J. Zorko, Michelle E. Kho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 20% |
| United States | 14 | 14% |
| Canada | 9 | 9% |
| Australia | 7 | 7% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 4 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 68% |
| Scientists | 18 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#702,953
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#23
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,751
of 444,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.