| Title |
Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monash Bioethics Review, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40592-018-0086-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia Cavaliere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#831,150
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Monash Bioethics Review
#12
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,478
of 447,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monash Bioethics Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them