↓ Skip to main content

Maximum Urine Concentrating Capability in a Mathematical Model of the Inner Medulla of the Rat Kidney

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Maximum Urine Concentrating Capability in a Mathematical Model of the Inner Medulla of the Rat Kidney
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11538-009-9448-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Marcano, Anita T. Layton, Harold E. Layton

Abstract

In a mathematical model of the urine concentrating mechanism of the inner medulla of the rat kidney, a nonlinear optimization technique was used to estimate parameter sets that maximize the urine-to-plasma osmolality ratio (U/P) while maintaining the urine flow rate within a plausible physiologic range. The model, which used a central core formulation, represented loops of Henle turning at all levels of the inner medulla and a composite collecting duct (CD). The parameters varied were: water flow and urea concentration in tubular fluid entering the descending thin limbs and the composite CD at the outer-inner medullary boundary; scaling factors for the number of loops of Henle and CDs as a function of medullary depth; location and increase rate of the urea permeability profile along the CD; and a scaling factor for the maximum rate of NaCl transport from the CD. The optimization algorithm sought to maximize a quantity E that equaled U/P minus a penalty function for insufficient urine flow. Maxima of E were sought by changing parameter values in the direction in parameter space in which E increased. The algorithm attained a maximum E that increased urine osmolality and inner medullary concentrating capability by 37.5% and 80.2%, respectively, above base-case values; the corresponding urine flow rate and the concentrations of NaCl and urea were all within or near reported experimental ranges. Our results predict that urine osmolality is particularly sensitive to three parameters: the urea concentration in tubular fluid entering the CD at the outer-inner medullary boundary, the location and increase rate of the urea permeability profile along the CD, and the rate of decrease of the CD population (and thus of CD surface area) along the cortico-medullary axis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 27%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Mathematics 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#720
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,195
of 92,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.