↓ Skip to main content

Human iron transporters

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Human iron transporters
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12263-010-0184-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Garrick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 53 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,580,718
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#146
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,874
of 96,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.