↓ Skip to main content

Progressive sampling-based Bayesian optimization for efficient and automatic machine learning model selection

Overview of attention for article published in Health Information Science and Systems, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Progressive sampling-based Bayesian optimization for efficient and automatic machine learning model selection
Published in
Health Information Science and Systems, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13755-017-0023-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueqiang Zeng, Gang Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 21%
Engineering 7 10%
Mathematics 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,432,184
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Health Information Science and Systems
#40
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,039
of 321,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Information Science and Systems
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.