↓ Skip to main content

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference: an additional target for goal-directed therapy in septic shock?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference: an additional target for goal-directed therapy in septic shock?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1199-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrice Vallée, Benoit Vallet, Olivier Mathe, Jacqueline Parraguette, Arnaud Mari, Stein Silva, Kamran Samii, Olivier Fourcade, Michèle Genestal

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that, in resuscitated septic shock patients, central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference [P(cv-a)CO(2)] may serve as a global index of tissue perfusion when the central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2)) goal value has already been reached.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 244 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 45 18%
Other 43 17%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 198 77%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 47 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,615
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,118
of 81,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.