| Title |
Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6121-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matti T. J. Heino, Keegan Knittle, Ari Haukkala, Tommi Vasankari, Nelli Hankonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,807
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,356
of 450,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#157
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.