You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The dilemma of pest suppression in the conservation of endangered species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter H. Adler, Jeb Barzen, Elmer Gray, Anne Lacy, Richard P. Urbanek, Sarah J. Converse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,451,006
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#874
of 3,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,391
of 354,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#21
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.