You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coffee and tea drinking in relation to the risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-018-1874-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raul Zamora-Ros, Muath A. Alghamdi, Valerie Cayssials, Silvia Franceschi, Martin Almquist, Joakim Hennings, Maria Sandström, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Elisabete Weiderpass, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Bodil Hammer Bech, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Kristina E. N. Petersen, Francesca Romana Mancini, Yahya Mahamat-Saleh, Fabrice Bonnet, Tilman Kühn, Renée T. Fortner, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Christina Bamia, Georgia Martimianaki, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Francesca Fasanelli, Guri Skeie, Tonje Braaten, Cristina Lasheras, Elena Salamanca-Fernández, Pilar Amiano, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Aurelio Barricarte, Jonas Manjer, Peter Wallström, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Petra H. Peeters, Kay-Thee Khaw, Nicholas J. Wareham, Julie A. Schmidt, Dagfinn Aune, Graham Byrnes, Augustin Scalbert, Antonio Agudo, Sabina Rinaldi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,086,115
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,057
of 2,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,934
of 444,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.