↓ Skip to main content

A SNARE–adaptor interaction is a new mode of cargo recognition in clathrin-coated vesicles

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A SNARE–adaptor interaction is a new mode of cargo recognition in clathrin-coated vesicles
Published in
Nature, November 2007
DOI 10.1038/nature06353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon E. Miller, Brett M. Collins, Airlie J. McCoy, Margaret S. Robinson, David J. Owen

Abstract

Soluble NSF attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) are type II transmembrane proteins that have critical roles in providing the specificity and energy for transport-vesicle fusion and must therefore be correctly partitioned between vesicle and organelle membranes. Like all other cargo, SNAREs need to be sorted into the forming vesicles by direct interaction with components of the vesicles' coats. Here we characterize the molecular details governing the sorting of a SNARE into clathrin-coated vesicles, namely the direct recognition of the three-helical bundle H(abc) domain of the mouse SNARE Vti1b by the human clathrin adaptor epsinR (EPNR, also known as CLINT1). Structures of each domain and of their complex show that this interaction (dissociation constant 22 muM) is mediated by surface patches composed of approximately 15 residues each, the topographies of which are dependent on each domain's overall fold. Disruption of the interface with point mutations abolishes the interaction in vitro and causes Vti1b to become relocalized to late endosomes and lysosomes. This new class of highly specific, surface-surface interaction between the clathrin coat component and the cargo is distinct from the widely observed binding of short, linear cargo motifs by the assembly polypeptide (AP) complex and GGA adaptors and is therefore not vulnerable to competition from standard motif-containing cargoes for incorporation into clathrin-coated vesicles. We propose that conceptually similar but mechanistically different interactions will direct the post-Golgi trafficking of many SNAREs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
France 3 2%
China 2 1%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 145 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 17 11%
Professor 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 22%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#62,288
of 90,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,811
of 76,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#385
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.