| Title |
Developing a five-step training model for transperineal prostate biopsies in a naïve residents’ group: a prospective observational randomised study of two different techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2599-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guglielmo Mantica, Andrea Pacchetti, Roberta Aimar, Mattia Cerasuolo, Federico Dotta, Alberto Olivero, Giovannalberto Pini, Giovanni Passaretti, Massimo Maffezzini, Carlo Terrone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,453,366
of 24,385,762 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#162
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,289
of 445,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#9
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,385,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.