You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges of differential placebo effects in contemporary medicine: The example of brain stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.25387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Burke, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Alvaro Pascual‐Leone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,587,368
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#2,397
of 5,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,911
of 453,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.