| Title |
Rapid capture and visual detection of copper ions in aqueous solutions and biofluids using a novel cellulose-Schiff base
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10570-018-2083-x |
| Authors |
Lianwei Zhang, Ruijia Wang, Rui Liu, Xiaolin Du, Ranju Meng, Lin Liu, Juming Yao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,554,476
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#719
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,034
of 346,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.