↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Finger Length Ratios of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Finger Length Ratios of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1369-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuesday M. Watts, Luke Holmes, Jamie Raines, Sheina Orbell, Gerulf Rieger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,836,371
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,716
of 3,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,278
of 437,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#32
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.