↓ Skip to main content

Labour Q1 pain – poorly analysed and reported: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Labour Q1 pain – poorly analysed and reported: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12884-018-2089-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Järnbert-Pettersson, Linda Vixner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Psychology 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,433,178
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,746
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,341
of 436,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#93
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.