| Title |
Authors’ Reply to Cross et al.: Comment on: “The Effectiveness of Resisted Sled Training (RST) for Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-018-01037-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro E. Alcaraz, Jorge Carlos-Vivas, Bruno O. Oponjuru, Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 19% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,629,879
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,510
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,132
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#33
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.