| Title |
Middle managers’ role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Birken, Alecia Clary, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Kea Turner, Rosemary Meza, Alexandra Zizzi, Madeline Larson, Jennifer Walker, Martin Charns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 20% |
| United States | 14 | 18% |
| Canada | 11 | 14% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 46% |
| Scientists | 31 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#850,949
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#90
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,965
of 447,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.