↓ Skip to main content

Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Where Cisplatin is Unsuitable: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Where Cisplatin is Unsuitable: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40273-018-0750-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shijie Ren, Hazel Squires, Emma Hock, Eva Kaltenthaler, Andrew Rawdin, Constantine Alifrangis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,659,789
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,661
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,752
of 436,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.