| Title |
Three Out of Ten Working Patients Expect No Clinical Improvement of Their Ability to Perform Work-Related Knee-Demanding Activities After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-018-9823-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvonne van Zaanen, Rutger C. I. van Geenen, Thijs M. J. Pahlplatz, Arthur J. Kievit, Marco J. M. Hoozemans, Eric W. P. Bakker, Leendert Blankevoort, Matthias U. Schafroth, Daniel Haverkamp, Ton M. J. S. Vervest, Dirk H. P. W. Das, Walter van der Weegen, Vanessa A. Scholtes, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen, P. Paul F. M. Kuijer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,479,932
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#262
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,829
of 437,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.