↓ Skip to main content

Local Gambling Norms and Audit Pricing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Local Gambling Norms and Audit Pricing
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-4079-8
Authors

Jeffrey L. Callen, Xiaohua Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Lecturer 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 26 45%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,659,789
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,577
of 2,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,764
of 436,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.