↓ Skip to main content

Daunorubicin/Cytarabine Liposome: A Review in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Daunorubicin/Cytarabine Liposome: A Review in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
Published in
Drugs, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40265-018-1022-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah A. Blair

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 31 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Chemistry 9 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,659,789
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#3,021
of 3,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,079
of 436,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#31
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.