You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magnesium status and supplementation influence vitamin D status and metabolism: results from a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqy274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qi Dai, Xiangzhu Zhu, JoAnn E Manson, Yiqing Song, Xingnan Li, Adrian A Franke, Rebecca B Costello, Andrea Rosanoff, Hui Nian, Lei Fan, Harvey Murff, Reid M Ness, Douglas L Seidner, Chang Yu, Martha J Shrubsole |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 21 | 10% |
| United States | 20 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 138 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 185 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 10% |
| Scientists | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#39,919
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#137
of 12,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#734
of 448,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.