↓ Skip to main content

Ovalbumin‐sensitized mice are good models for airway hyperresponsiveness but not acute physiological responses to allergen inhalation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovalbumin‐sensitized mice are good models for airway hyperresponsiveness but not acute physiological responses to allergen inhalation
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, December 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02884.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. R. Zosky, A. N. Larcombe, O. J. White, J. T. Burchell, T. Z. Janosi, Z. Hantos, P. G. Holt, P. D. Sly, D. J. Turner

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized clinically by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to bronchoconstricting agents. The physiological response of the asthmatic lung to inhaled allergen is often characterized by two distinct phases: an early-phase response (EPR) within the first hour following exposure that subsides and a late-phase response (LPR) that is more prolonged and may occur several hours later. Mouse models of asthma have become increasingly popular and should be designed to exhibit an EPR, LPR and AHR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 11 16%
Professor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#1,422
of 3,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,732
of 167,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.