| Title |
Trends of loss of peripheral muscle thickness on ultrasonography and its relationship with outcomes among patients with sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-018-0350-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vijay Hadda, Rohit Kumar, Gopi Chand Khilnani, Mani Kalaivani, Karan Madan, Pawan Tiwari, Saurabh Mittal, Anant Mohan, Ashu Seith Bhalla, Randeep Guleria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 21% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,580,718
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#286
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,586
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.