| Title |
An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-018-0173-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. B. Legradi, C. Di Paolo, M. H. S. Kraak, H. G. van der Geest, E. L. Schymanski, A. J. Williams, M. M. L. Dingemans, R. Massei, W. Brack, X. Cousin, M.-L. Begout, R. van der Oost, A. Carion, V. Suarez-Ulloa, F. Silvestre, B. I. Escher, M. Engwall, G. Nilén, S. H. Keiter, D. Pollet, P. Waldmann, C. Kienle, I. Werner, A.-C. Haigis, D. Knapen, L. Vergauwen, M. Spehr, W. Schulz, W. Busch, D. Leuthold, S. Scholz, C. M. vom Berg, N. Basu, C. A. Murphy, A. Lampert, J. Kuckelkorn, T. Grummt, H. Hollert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Belgium | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 73 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,007,366
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#153
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,700
of 448,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.