You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the ethical use of digital data in human research: challenges and strategies to promote ethical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethics and Information Technology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-018-9490-4 |
| Authors |
Karin Clark, Matt Duckham, Marilys Guillemin, Assunta Hunter, Jodie McVernon, Christine O’Keefe, Cathy Pitkin, Steven Prawer, Richard Sinnott, Deborah Warr, Jenny Waycott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sudan | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,016,096
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#75
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,111
of 448,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.