Title |
Prevalence of degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00784-018-2664-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leticia Lopes Quirino Pantoja, Isabela Porto de Toledo, Yasmine Mendes Pupo, André Luís Porporatti, Graziela De Luca Canto, Liete Figueiredo Zwir, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 40 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,980,452
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#226
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,394
of 346,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.