↓ Skip to main content

Global Ethos, Leadership Styles, and Values: a Conceptual Framework for Overcoming the Twofold Bias of Leadership Ethics

Overview of attention for article published in Humanistic Management Journal, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 111)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Global Ethos, Leadership Styles, and Values: a Conceptual Framework for Overcoming the Twofold Bias of Leadership Ethics
Published in
Humanistic Management Journal, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41463-018-0047-9
Authors

Friedrich Glauner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,280,089
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Humanistic Management Journal
#35
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,672
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanistic Management Journal
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.