| Title |
Foraging Performance, Prosociality, and Kin Presence Do Not Predict Lifetime Reproductive Success in Batek Hunter-Gatherers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Nature, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12110-018-9334-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas S. Kraft, Vivek V. Venkataraman, Ivan Tacey, Nathaniel J. Dominy, Kirk M. Endicott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 69% |
| Scientists | 12 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,514,292
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#142
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,821
of 447,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them