↓ Skip to main content

Computational Influence of Adult Neurogenesis on Memory Encoding

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
515 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Influence of Adult Neurogenesis on Memory Encoding
Published in
Neuron, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

James B. Aimone, Janet Wiles, Fred H. Gage

Abstract

Adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus leads to the incorporation of thousands of new granule cells into the dentate gyrus every month, but its function remains unclear. Here, we present computational evidence that indicates that adult neurogenesis may make three separate but related contributions to memory formation. First, immature neurons introduce a degree of similarity to memories learned at the same time, a process we refer to as pattern integration. Second, the extended maturation and change in excitability of these neurons make this added similarity a time-dependent effect, supporting the possibility that temporal information is included in new hippocampal memories. Finally, our model suggests that the experience-dependent addition of neurons results in a dentate gyrus network well suited for encoding new memories in familiar contexts while treating novel contexts differently. Taken together, these results indicate that new granule cells may affect hippocampal function in several unique and previously unpredicted ways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 4%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 468 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 30%
Researcher 109 21%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Student > Master 49 10%
Professor 24 5%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 64 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 32%
Neuroscience 104 20%
Psychology 58 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 7%
Computer Science 30 6%
Other 46 9%
Unknown 75 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,095,095
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#4,481
of 9,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,280
of 183,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.