You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Nutrition, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M O'Keeffe, M Kelly, E O'Herlihy, P W O'Toole, P M Kearney, S Timmons, E O'Shea, C Stanton, M Hickson, Y Rolland, C Sulmont Rossé, S Issanchou, I Maitre, M Stelmach-Mardas, G Nagel, M Flechtner-Mors, M Wolters, A Hebestreit, L C P G M De Groot, O van de Rest, R Teh, M A Peyron, D Dardevet, I Papet, K Schindler, M Streicher, G Torbahn, E Kiesswetter, M Visser, D Volkert, E M O'Connor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 585 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 585 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 8% |
| Researcher | 30 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 80 | 14% |
| Unknown | 249 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 99 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 16% |
| Psychology | 21 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 12% |
| Unknown | 271 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,073,713
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#899
of 3,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,605
of 448,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#28
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.