↓ Skip to main content

Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00392-018-1403-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kris G. Vargas, Paul M. Haller, Bernhard Jäger, Maximilian Tscharre, Ronald K. Binder, Christian Mueller, Bertil Lindahl, Kurt Huber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 38%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,907,621
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#336
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,683
of 445,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.