| Title |
Technical variations and feasibility of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified across continents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-018-1889-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Zaghiyan, J. Warusavitarne, A. Spinelli, P. Chandrasinghe, F. Di Candido, P. Fleshner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Italy | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 28% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,706,780
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#146
of 1,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,552
of 448,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.