↓ Skip to main content

Historiographic narratives and empirical evidence: a case study

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Historiographic narratives and empirical evidence: a case study
Published in
Synthese, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-02065-w
Authors

Efraim Wallach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 33%
Arts and Humanities 3 25%
Philosophy 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,633,933
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,184
of 2,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,214
of 406,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.