↓ Skip to main content

Scholarly impact assessment: a survey of citation weighting solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Scholarly impact assessment: a survey of citation weighting solutions
Published in
Scientometrics, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2973-6
Authors

Liwei Cai, Jiahao Tian, Jiaying Liu, Xiaomei Bai, Ivan Lee, Xiangjie Kong, Feng Xia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Lecturer 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 24%
Social Sciences 8 19%
Engineering 6 14%
Linguistics 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,000,271
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,243
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,596
of 436,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.