| Title |
Developmental venous anomalies and brainstem cavernous malformations: a proposed physiological mechanism for haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurosurgical Review, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10143-018-1039-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William N Maish |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,580,718
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Review
#112
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,853
of 346,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Review
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.