Title |
Sleep paralysis epidemiological survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sleep and Biological Rhythms, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/sbr.12045 |
Authors |
Shengli Ma, Tao Wu, Guofu Pi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 21% |
Librarian | 4 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
Psychology | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 27 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,598,118
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#69
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,274
of 320,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.