You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bronchiectasis in Infants and Preschool Children Diagnosed with Cystic Fibrosis after Newborn Screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pediatrics, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen M. Stick, Siobhain Brennan, Conor Murray, Tonia Douglas, Britta S. von Ungern-Sternberg, Luke W. Garratt, Catherine L. Gangell, Nicholas De Klerk, Barry Linnane, Sarath Ranganathan, Phillip Robinson, Colin Robertson, Peter D. Sly, Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for Cystic Fibrosis |
Abstract |
To determine the prevalence of bronchiectasis in young children with cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosed after newborn screening (NBS) and the relationship of bronchiectasis to pulmonary inflammation and infection. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#4,487
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,384
of 122,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#18
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.