| Title |
Severity and incidence of complications assessed by the Clavien–Dindo classification following robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-018-06624-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen-Jie Wang, Hong-Tao Li, Jian-Ping Yu, Lin Su, Chang-An Guo, Peng Chen, Long Yan, Kun Li, You-Wei Ma, Ling Wang, Wei Hu, Yu-Min Li, Hong-Bin Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 25% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,625
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,577
of 434,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#36
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.