↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
744 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
443 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1000552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce A Cooper, Pauline Branley, Liliana Bulfone, John F Collins, Jonathan C Craig, Margaret B Fraenkel, Anthony Harris, David W Johnson, Joan Kesselhut, Jing Jing Li, Grant Luxton, Andrew Pilmore, David J Tiller, David C Harris, Carol A Pollock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 423 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 16%
Other 46 10%
Student > Postgraduate 41 9%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Other 132 30%
Unknown 78 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 291 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 1%
Psychology 5 1%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 89 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#385,864
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,695
of 32,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#944
of 105,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#14
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.