| Title |
Inhaled amikacin for severe Gram-negative pulmonary infections in the intensive care unit: current status and future prospects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-1958-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoni Torres, Anna Motos, Denise Battaglini, Gianluigi Li Bassi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Uganda | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 28% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,366,927
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,059
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,465
of 429,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#52
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.