| Title |
Predicting Yellow Fever Through Species Distribution Modeling of Virus, Vector, and Monkeys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-018-1388-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco A. B. de Almeida, Edmilson dos Santos, Jáder da C. Cardoso, Lucas G. da Silva, Rafael M. Rabelo, Júlio César Bicca-Marques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 47% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,477,265
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#86
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,038
of 409,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them