↓ Skip to main content

Cell salvage using the continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart – an observational bicenter technical evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Cell salvage using the continuous autotransfusion device CATSmart – an observational bicenter technical evaluation
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12871-018-0651-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Lindau, Madeline Kohlhaas, Michael Nosch, Suma Choorapoikayil, Kai Zacharowski, Patrick Meybohm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Engineering 4 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,474,960
of 23,628,742 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#507
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,244
of 439,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#31
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,628,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.