You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The area under the precision‐recall curve as a performance metric for rare binary events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13140 |
| Authors |
Helen R. Sofaer, Jennifer A. Hoeting, Catherine S. Jarnevich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 10% |
| Engineering | 15 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 83 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,062,881
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#962
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,731
of 461,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.