↓ Skip to main content

Inconsistent screening for lead endangers vulnerable children: policy lessons from South Bend and Saint Joseph County, Indiana, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 846)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Inconsistent screening for lead endangers vulnerable children: policy lessons from South Bend and Saint Joseph County, Indiana, USA
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, December 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41271-018-0155-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi Beidinger-Burnett, Lacey Ahern, Michelle Ngai, Gabriel Filippelli, Matthew Sisk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#425,847
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#20
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,993
of 417,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.