↓ Skip to main content

Accounting for intraspecific diversity when examining relationships between non-native species and functional diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Accounting for intraspecific diversity when examining relationships between non-native species and functional diversity
Published in
Oecologia, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4311-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Zhao, S. Villéger, J. Cucherousset

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 48%
Environmental Science 9 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,944,485
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,012
of 4,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,855
of 437,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#44
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.