↓ Skip to main content

Transparency in Residency Education: Nominating Residents for Fellowships and Awards

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Transparency in Residency Education: Nominating Residents for Fellowships and Awards
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40596-018-0999-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah L. Cabaniss, Michael Devlin, James I. Rim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,397,463
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#554
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,227
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.