↓ Skip to main content

Discovery and ecogenomic context of a global Caldiserica-related phylum active in thawing permafrost, Candidatus Cryosericota phylum nov., Ca. Cryosericia class nov., Ca. Cryosericales ord. nov., Ca.

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic & Applied Microbiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery and ecogenomic context of a global Caldiserica-related phylum active in thawing permafrost, Candidatus Cryosericota phylum nov., Ca. Cryosericia class nov., Ca. Cryosericales ord. nov., Ca. Cryosericaceae fam. nov., comprising the four species Cryosericum septentrionale gen. nov. sp. nov., Ca. C. hinesii sp. nov., Ca. C. odellii sp. nov., Ca. C. terrychapinii sp. nov.
Published in
Systematic & Applied Microbiology, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.12.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A Martinez, Ben J Woodcroft, Julio C Ignacio Espinoza, Ahmed A Zayed, Caitlin M Singleton, Joel A Boyd, Yueh-Fen Li, Samuel Purvine, Heather Maughan, Suzanne B Hodgkins, Darya Anderson, Maya Sederholm, Ben Temperton, Benjamin Bolduc, Scott R Saleska, Gene W Tyson, Virginia I Rich, Scott R Saleska, Gene W Tyson, Virginia I Rich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,596,995
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Systematic & Applied Microbiology
#51
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,224
of 444,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic & Applied Microbiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.